Faculty Questionnaire - Teaching Skills  
   
   

1. Demographics

Name and Degree(s)
     
Number of Years in Teaching  
     
Teaching Activities Currently Taught
at OU-COM, (include any lecture, CPC,
PCC, or labs)
CPC Medical Knowledge
CPC Clinical Skills
PCC Biomedical Sciences
PCC Clinical Science
Introduction to Clinical Osteopathic Medicine (ICOM)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
     
OU-COM Committee that you
currently serve on:
Curriculum Advisory Committee (CAC) (chair? yes no)
CPC Steering Committee (CPSC) (chair? yes no)
PCC Steering Committee (PCSC) (chair? yes no)
CPC Block Team: (chair? yes no)
Research & Scholarly Affairs (chair? yes no)
Other (specify) (chair? yes no)
Other (specify) (chair? yes no)
Other (specify) (chair? yes no)
     
Area of academic specialty, interest, and reseach interest(s)
     
Faculty Mentor  
     
Anyone you mentor?  
     
Orientation to OU-COM to date? Department  
  Tenure  
  Mentor  
  Curriculum  
  Teaching Assignments  
       Lecture  
       Lab  
       CBL  
       S&I  
       Clinic  
       Block Team  
       Committees  

2. Faculty Development Experience

I have had formal faculty development training   yes no
   
If YES, I have received education in Effective Teaching
Curriculum Planning & Development
Administrative Skills
Student Assessment
Research Skills
Program Evaluation
Leadership Skills
Other (specify)

3. For each of the following, rate your current level of expertise (see addendum for definitions) AND desire to master.

Education (Instructional Design/Curriculum Development/Assessment)

     
  Level of Expertise Desire to Master
(1=none; 10=great)
     
Curriculum Design & Implementation    
     
Curriculum Evaluation    
     
Assessing Student Performance    
     
Lesson Planning    
     
Test Question Writing    
     
Learning Theory    
     
Using Technology in the
Classroom
   
     
Emotional Quotient    
     
Learner-Centered Education    
     
     
Administration (Organization/Leadership)
     
  Level of Expertise Desire to Master
(1=none; 10=great)
     
Delegation    
     
Supervision    
     
Negotiation    
     
Time Management    
     
Management 101    
     
Leadership Skills,
Leadership 101
   
     
Meeting Management    
     
Practical/Clinical Skills    
     
Conflict Management    
     
     
Research
     
  Level of Expertise Desire to Master
(1=none; 10=great)
     
Research Design    
     
Conducting Research    
     
Evidence-Based Medicine    
     
Grant Writing  (see "Oral & Written Communication") 
     
     
Professional Academic Skills (Teaching/Facilitating/Advising/Mentoring)
     
  Level of Expertise Desire to Master
(1=none; 10=great)
     
Facilitating Small Groups    
     
Giving Effective Feedback    
     
Giving Effective Lectures    
     
Mentoring    
     
Advising    
     
Risk Management    
     
Cultural Competence    
     
Understanding Osteopathic Philosophy and Principles    
     
Online Teaching Tools    
     
     
Oral & Written Communication
     
  Level of Expertise Desire to Master
(1=none; 10=great)
     
Presentation Skills    
     
PowerPoint Skills    
     
Email Etiquette    
     
Grant Writing    
     
Other*
     
* Other examples: Learner characteristics (adult learners (andragogy)/learning styles), personality types, 7 Habits, syllabus construction, writing objectives, classroom assessment techniques, lecture prep, Power Point slide creation, Student Response System, small group facilitation, classroom management, ethics, mind mapping, ...

4. Observation Times

Teaching, Administrative or Leadership Activity Times at which you be observed in this Activity
   
   
   
   
   
   

5. Additional Questions

What do you want students to say about you after
their experience with you?
 
   
What are your aspirations?  
   
What is your teaching philosophy?  
   
What about medical education jazzes you?  
   
How did you come to be who you are?  

Dr. Davis will contact you to schedule a 30-45 minute meeting to review the questionnaire and begin to craft an Individual Professional Development Program Plan (IPDP).
   
   
Addendum:

Stuart E. Dreyfus, an applied mathematician, and Hubert L. Dreyfus, a philosopher, developed a model of skill acquisition based on the study of chess players, air force pilots, and army tank drivers and commanders (S. E. Dreyfus, 1982; H. L. Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1977, 1986; S. E. Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1979, 1980).

Dreyfus claims that following rules, as is done by expert systems is not enough. It can't capture the richness, the ``thickness'' of human experience. Part of the Dreyfus' argument is based on their five-stage model of progress from novice to expert describing skill acquisition:

  1. Novice
  2. Advanced beginner
  3. Competent
  4. Proficient
  5. Expert

These levels are described in Michael Eraut’s book, Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence.

Novice (Level #1): Operates by consciously-learnt context-free rules. Lacks any sense of the overall task.

  • Rigid adherence to taught rules or plans
     
  • Little situational perception
     
  • No discretionary judgment

Advanced Beginner (Level #2): Uses more sophisticated rules, which refer to situational elements as well as context-free ones. These situational elements are features such as the pattern of behavior which distinguishes a drunken from a sober driver. They're learnt by experience, and the advanced beginner can't formalize them.

  • Guidelines for action are based on attributes or aspects. (Aspects are global characteristics of situations that can be recognized only after some prior experience)
     
  • Situational perception is still limited
     
  • All attributes and aspects are treated separately and given equal importance.

Competent (Level #3): Has now learnt to recognize many context-free and situational elements. Still lacks any sense of their overall importance to the task, and rapidly becomes overwhelmed. Tries to overcome this by hierarchical goal-based planning. This hierarchical decomposition of the task means that, at any time, the competent pays attention only to that small number of features relevant to a particular sub-goal, thus avoiding being overwhelmed.

  • Coping with crowdedness
     
  • Now sees actions at least partially in terms of longer-term goals
     
  • Conscious deliberate planning
     
  • Standardized and routinized procedures

Proficient (Level #4): Most of the time, now performs task(s) intuitively, without analytical thought. But this deep involvement in the task will be broken when certain elements present themselves as particularly important. The proficient then stops and thinks analytically about what to do next.

  • See situations holistically rather than in terms of aspects
     
  • See what is most important in a situation
     
  • Perceives deviations from the normal pattern
     
  • Decision-making is less labored
     
  • Uses maxims for guidance, whose meaning varies according to the situation (maxim = expression of a truth or principle).

Expert (Level #5): Performs his task intuitively, almost all the time. Occasionally has to stop and deliberate, but this involves critical reflection on his intuitions, rather than goal-based planning.

  • No longer relies on rules, guidelines or maxims
     
  • Intuitive grasp of situations based on deep tacit understanding
     
  • Analytic approaches are only used in novel situation or when a problem occurs
     
  • Vision of what is possible

A level #6 master has been characterized by Paul Batalden as “loves surprises!”

So this is a progression from rule-based problem-solving to a different approach based on matching against past experiences. The first is similar to classical symbolic AI, which divides problems down into bits, divides the job between different components, and puts the results together. The second involves some kind of holistic pattern recognition.

Classical AI assumes the mind also divides problems down into bits, divides the job between different components, and puts the results together. Hence it's not a good model for expert performance. Digital computers require one to organize tasks in this way: hence they can't achieve expert performance. What is required for holistic pattern recognition is something like a holographic recognizer.

   
   
EDUCATION RESEARCH COMMUNITY DIVERSITY HOME
   
  Ohio University
College of Osteopathic Medicine
218 Grosvenor Hall, Athens, Ohio 45701
740-593-2190
Last updated: 03/24/2011

Hit Counter