Subject/Title:

Policy Number

10.11

Admissions (Student): Selection Process

Effective Date

January 1, 1992

Revised Date

July 11, 2012

 

Department

Student & Professional

Support & Relations

Issued by:

John D. Schriner,
Director, Admissions

Approved by:

John Brose, D.O., Dean

 

 

I.       Selection Process

Two major categories of criteria are applied by the Student Selection Advisory Committee to select from the applicants who have been interviewed.

 

A.     Academic Ability

We must determine if the applicant could survive our curriculum.  If the applicant’s credentials and the data collected at the time of the interview suggest the applicant would be unable to accommodate the academic load at the Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine (OU-HCOM), we risk filling one of the seats available to new freshmen with an individual who would fail to graduate.  If this were to happen, the people of the State of Ohio would lose a great deal in terms of their investment in the development of this College.  And, more immediately, OU-HCOM loses the tuition and the enrollment-driven subsidy, which make up the majority of the College’s budget.  If an applicant interviews well, but the Committee judges the applicant would probably not survive our curriculum, we must then face the fact that the quality of the applicant’s personality and motivation is of no significance. 

 

B.     Professional Promise

When the question about academic survival has been satisfied, we can explore whether this applicant would become a D.O. of whom we would be proud.  The quality of the applicant’s academic background may influence this judgment as well, but it is more important for applicants to convince the three committee members with whom they have separate interviews that they would become “good doctors”.  Their ability to think clearly, to communicate effectively and their interest in osteopathic medical science are of major significance.  The genuineness of their interest in the osteopathic profession as a career choice is always a major factor for consideration.  In our experience, we have discovered that long or close personal association with the osteopathic profession does not necessarily promise strong commitment to the osteopathic profession.  

 

Additional questions of major significance to the Selection Committee are if applicants:

      • are caring and compassionate individuals
      • have good interpersonal communication skills
      • know their physical and intellectual limitations
      • are ethical and moral individuals

 

If it appears likely that the applicant would become outstanding and supply real leadership to the profession, this will have considerable influence on the judgment of the Committee.  If the individual has a high degree of interest in being of service to people who would benefit from osteopathic health care, this too will improve the applicant’s chance for admission. 

 

II.                Admissions Interview Decisions

 

At 4:00 p.m. each interview day, the full committee meets to decide by consensus the status of the day’s applicants.  To accept, to put on the alternative list, or reject.

 

During the same week of interview, letters are sent to the applicants from the Admissions Office informing them of their applications’ status. 

 

Individual policies relating to each of the three categories are as follows:

 

A.     Accept

Qualified students accepted by the Selection Committee are offered a seat in the following year’s class.

 

The student’s admission is contingent upon the receipt of official transcripts from all colleges attended, including any post-baccalaureate and graduate programs, degree or non-degree.  The academic record will be verified and the student will be notified of any deficiencies he/she may have in our entrance requirements.

 

If the student is currently enrolled in classes, or plans to take additional courses between now and the date of matriculation, he/she must continue to forward transcripts showing all work completed.  These official transcripts should include grades for course work completed to satisfy any deficiencies he/she may have in our entrance requirements and reflect conferred degrees.  The student checks with his/her registrar to make certain that this information is included on the final official transcript.

 

Exceptional students who have not completed their baccalaureate degrees may be allowed to matriculate.  If for any reason they will not obtain their baccalaureate degrees, they must petition this office for committee approval.  The committee strongly prefers that each student obtain his/her baccalaureate degree.

 

The student has two weeks from the mailing date of the admissions letter to forward written confirmation regarding his/her desire to have a place reserved in the class or decline the office.  Students accepted in the fall are required to submit a first deposit of $100 in the form of check or money order payable to Ohio University after December 15th.  Students accepted after December 15th must submit their first deposit within two weeks of the date of acceptance.  A second deposit of $500 is required and must be received no later than June 15.  Upon registration, these nonrefundable advance enrollment deposits will be credited to the student’s tuition and fees.  The student should be sure to include both the letter of intent and the initial enrollment deposit.  

 

B.     Deferred Acceptance

 

When spaces in the class are filled, “accepted” applicants become “deferred accepted” and are either guaranteed a place in the following year’s class, or are given priority if other accepted applicants do not enroll.  Generally, their status is confirmed by August.

 

C.     Deferred Admission

 

Any applicant who is initially accepted to the College may petition for a one year deferment of his/her matriculation.  Petitions are routinely accepted for most reasons if asked for in a timely fashion.

 

D.    Alternate List

 

Qualified students who are not immediately accepted to this class may be place on the alternate list.  Based on the student’s alternate list placement, he/she may be offered a seat in the following year’s class, if one should become available. 

 

When all of the interviews are completed, the Student Selection Advisory Committee has a meeting during which committee members are given an opportunity to advocate individual candidates from the Alternate List.  In each round of presentations, a member of the committee is given the opportunity of advocating a single candidate.  These advocated candidates are discussed as a group and placed on the Alternate List according to the consensus developed during the discussion.  This process is repeated until none of the committee members expresses a desire to advocate more candidates.  It should be noted that “deferred admission” candidates must be placed and remain at the top of the Alternate List as we begin to advocate.

 

After the advocated candidates have been discussed and ranked, the rest of their ranking on the Alternate List will be done according to their relative position in the #1 to #10 ranking interview.  Category #1 will be the top of the list in descending order, to Alternate Hold Grouping #10, which will be the bottom of the list.  If there are ties within the group, the ranking will be determined by science grade point average.  Any remaining ties within these groups will be ranked by total MCAT scores. 

 

E.     Reject

 

The decision to reject an applicant indicates that the student is not longer in consideration for a seat in the following year’s class.  A rejected applicant is eligible to make reapplication for any subsequent year’s class.

 

NOTE:  While it is frequently necessary to provide a student with further explanation as to why his/her application was rejected or placed on the alternate list, precaution should be taken.  For example, it is inappropriate to discuss a student’s specific placement or location on the alternate list.

 

For additional information, please see HCOM policy #10.04, Admissions (Student):  General Process

 


Last updated: 10/25/2012