 |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
| |
|
Design
is a part of ordinary life. We make design decisions
every day when we choose what to wear, what color to
paint the rooms in our houses, what to plant in our
gardens, or what car to buy. Do we think about the
consequences of our choices—which can be functional,
beautiful, bleak or dreadful? Not really. We simply
choose what we like. But Dean Jack Brose, D.O., does
think about the consequences of design, and he’s
among a group of forward-thinking people at Ohio
University who understand that design can make a
difference.
Evidence-based design—design linked to positive
outcomes—has evolved and become increasingly popular
since Roger Ulrich’s 1984 ground breaking study
revealed that the environment in health-care
facilities affected medical outcomes. |















 |
| |
|
Much has been said about the environment in the
integrated learning and research facility proposed
by the College of Osteopathic Medicine and the Russ
College of Engineering and Technology, scheduled to
break ground in spring 2007: It’s a learning
community that will advance research. Classrooms
will be more like studios. Some workspaces will be
called hangars, corridors called pathways, and
common spaces will include a large living room, café
and fireplace nook. And all of these elements will
work together to encourage collaboration and
generate new research.
What do these things really mean and why are they
necessary in a classroom and research facility? To
find out, it’s important to go back to the genesis
of the project. |
| |
|
|
A
positive collaboration |
|
| |
|
As research in
cardiovascular disease, diabetes and musculoskeletal
medicine continues to outgrow existing space at
OU-COM, creating more lab space became a priority
for Brose. “As the college increasingly becomes a
nationally recognized research center, space for new
research activities is critical,” he says. “It was
clear to me the college needed a new building in
order to further its research mission.”
After drafting and presenting his proposal for a new
facility to Roderick McDavis, Ph.D., Ohio
University’s president, and Richard A. Vincent,
president of the Osteopathic Heritage Foundations,
Brose received their approval to move the project
forward. Then McDavis, inspired by the potential to
significantly advance research, brought the
university’s deans together to discuss the
possibilities.
The next day the president convened a meeting of the
deans and presented the proposal to them,” Brose
explains. “Dennis Irwin (dean of the Russ College of
Engineering and Technology) mentioned that his
college had already raised some money toward a new
classroom building and it might make sense for us to
combine our efforts.”
They did, and a new integrated learning and research
facility began to take shape. |
| |
|
|
Studios, labs and
a café |
|
| |
|
|
Burgess & Niple, an
engineering and architectural firm nationally known
for designing innovative spaces that facilitate
learning and encourage creativity, worked closely
with Deans Irwin, Brose and other university
administrators to design the building and the
academic and lab spaces.
“Space does affect
learning,” Jim Edwards flatly states. He’s an
engineer who designed the academic space. In the
modern context of collaborative learning, the
implications of space design are important and
relevant to the work being done in the building.
Edwards also believes that space can change the way
people teach.
From an engineering
point of view, the building will feature exposed
beams and structures so that students can examine
and understand how and why the building was put
together the way it was. It’s just one way to foster
academic connections outside the classroom. And
classrooms, Edwards notes, will be places that
encourage students to be flexible, to explore topics
and then create something, much the same way dance,
theater or art studios function, thereby affecting
the way classes are taught.
The 12 research and
six integrated labs are the heart and soul of the
building and Brose and OU-COM researcher Jack
Blazyk, Ph.D., associate dean for research, worked
closely with architect Jim Butz to design that area.
To move research out of its traditionally solitary
space and into a more open environment, the labs’
large windows will allow students, or whoever
happens to walk by, to see what researchers are
working on, which in turn, may stimulate an interest
in research and create further collaboration.
Butz notes that
creating a collaborative community is what drove the
design, “We’re going to change the way educators
think about teaching and learning and how students
view themselves,” he says. “The building needs to be
flexible enough to allow people to choose the spaces
that are right for their projects and to look at the
overall mission of how research benefits the
learning process.”
Brose also is
enthusiastic about the collaborative nature of the
building, “It’s one of the things I’m most excited
about,” he says. “This building will really move our
colleges together to further support our research
mission.”
A partnership between
engineering and medicine makes sense—blood flow and
fluid mechanics work on the same principle. Working
in close proximity, engineers and medical
researchers will be able to meet and talk about
their individual projects, which may inspire new
projects, particularly in the field of
bioengineering, a popular field of research that has
radically changed in the past few years, and for
which the two colleges have created a joint faculty
position.
“It’s been my
experience that great collaborations don’t come
about from formal meetings. They’re impromptu,”
Brose says. “They come from people standing in a
hallway and talking, going together to a conference,
or just bumping into each other. More ideas will
come from meeting someone in the café than from
formal meeting rooms.” |
| |
|
|
Predicting the
future |
|
| |
|
|
Expectations for
graduates are higher than ever. Twenty-first century
jobs require graduates to be independent, creative
thinkers who can also work in teams and to be
competent in a variety of disciplines. So it isn’t
surprising that OU-COM is interested in creating an
environment that encourages medical students to work
alongside engineering students.
“This is a very
innovative project,” Butz says. “Dean Brose has
great long-range vision and Jack Blazyk provided a
valuable research perspective. It was a positive
collaboration on how to merge research, education
and community and how to create the best facility to
foster that.”
Integrated research
facilities like this are rare, and when all is said
and done, this facility will be one of a few in the
country where this kind of collaboration is taking
place on a daily basis. And based on the latest
research, which demonstrates that the design of
educational space can influence goals, it’s clear
that the design of the building will contribute to
these dynamic partnerships.
“People will find
this building to be such a great environment,” Butz
continues. “Everyone will want to be in it, and that
demand will drive future research methods and
expansion.”
It’s anybody’s guess
what those future methods will be, but as Blazyk
points out, the path to their discovery will be
exciting.
|
| |
by
Susan Green |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Ohio University
College of Osteopathic Medicine
Grosvenor Hall, Athens, Ohio 45701
740-593-4232 |
|
|
|
|