|
By Rebecca
Marass and Peggy Stelzig
Our group met in Quito, the capital of
Ecuador. The first thing we did as a group was to tour two hospitals in the
city: one public and one private. There were stark differences that were
obvious when we first arrived at each hospital. The Public hospital was
rundown, weather beaten, litter was present, and vendors were hawking their
wares.
The hospital was on a major street where there was lots of traffic and air
pollution. On the other hand, the private hospital was a new building,
tucked back into a quiet suburb with modern design. It had quality
landscaping with private parking.
Upon entering the public hospital, there
was no reception desk, only a few benches to sit on and an area to catch an
elevator. The private hospital there was a modern, sleek reception desk
with a waiting area and a drug store.
There were differences when it came to the
different hospitals’ wards as well. The public hospital had basic wards,
such as neurology and internal medicine that were not further specialized.
There were few doctors present, only a few nurses running around to care for
patients needs. The private hospital had floors and wards that were
specialized to certain. Many doctors were
present and even had their own offices with exam rooms. Also, a noticeable
difference was the empty beds in the public hospital because many patients
had to be turned away due to lack of staff, equipment, and funding to care
for them. Most doctors worked a few hours at the public hospital and then
went to their own private practice.
When observing patient care in the rooms, the
public hospital had six people to a room with no privacy curtains present.
The beds were just a thin, raised mattress with a sheet to cover the beds.
Non occupied beds had no linens at all. Many of the procedures, such
as draining an abscess, happened right in the room, while others watched, in
an unsanitary environment. The “Sharps” containers were simply used
water jugs that were left uncapped under the solitary sink in each room.
During the short time we had to view the private hospital rooms, they had
privacy curtains between the patients, which only numbered two to three in
each room. All beds had fresh linens that could be easily adjusted to
the patients comfort.
The public hospital is funded by the
government, who only devotes a small portion of their budget into health
care. This results in the lack of equipment and staff. A few doctors take
advantage of their position and use the equipment that the public hospital
does have to supply their own private practice. This may be the norm but we
met a surgeon who is dedicated to the public hospital and finds rewards not
in salary, but in helping people. This hospital is striving to become a
private one so that it can offer better health care, but the actual
constitution prevents the public hospital from doing so.
The private hospital is able
to have quality health care because they are serving only a select few in
Quito, those who can afford health care and insurance. Unlike the public
hospital, they are actually able to make money to keep themselves in
business. It is impossible for the public hospital to make money because
they offer free or low cost health care to the general public. In larger
cities, like Quito, there is always a large poor population that needs
health care because of their living conditions. The poor of Quito can’t
afford to maintain their health because they struggle to even keep a roof
over their heads.
In conclusion, the differences between the
public and private hospitals can be summed up by the different patients that
go there. In the public hospital, only poor people went due to free or low
cost basic health care. Whereas at the private hospital, middle and upper
class individuals came because they could afford better health care with
higher quality equipment, doctors and more personal attention.
On a side note, the public hospital closed
down due to health care workers strike because they haven’t been paid in
several months. |

Health care with standards comparable to those
of any developed nation is available in the large urban areas of
Ecuador to the few that can afford it. M.G.

Although most of the staff that works in public
health care sector are committed to their mission, the lack of
organization and a bureocratic administration of resources makes it
impossible for them to deliver high quality health care.
M.G.

The perseption of the many people we interacted
with during our visit is that the public hospital is a place for the
seek and diseased, not a place for healing and recovery. Most of the
limited financial resources available for public health care in
Ecuador are used in administrative and personnel costs and treatment.
Very little resources are used for infrastructure maintainance and
improvement, disease prevention and health education.
M.G.

Visiting a public health care hospital is an eye
oppening experience for participants that come from developed nations.
M.G.
|