|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
June 12, 2002 By Phil, Brandon & Kim Quito: “Gross
Inequities” We departed from our hotel at the break of day and ventured out into the concrete jungle that is Quito. Dodging buses and weaving through traffic at break-neck speeds we caught our first glimpse of the chaos that would be paralleled in our visits to the health centers in the metropolitan area. This chaos was underscored by several glaring inequities between the public and private health care hospitals. Of these inequities the most striking were the differences in the medical equipment present, the quality of the treatment facilities, and the salaries of the physicians.
Arriving at the public hospital (Eugenio Espejo Hospital), we were
greeted by the wandering, sickly masses milling about the hospital
grounds. Our group was then
quickly escorted into a small waiting room.
As we passed through the cardiology wing, we spoke with the chair
of cardiology. The doctor
informed us of the threadbare that the hospital operated under. In particular the doctor pointed out the hospital’s lack of
functional modern medical equipment.
With antiquated X-ray machines, problematic autoclaves, and
outdated surgery theaters the public hospital’s meager equipment status
was well below the benchmark of healthcare standards held in the United
States. However, this quality
of health care was the best available to the throngs of poor, sick,
Ecuadorian people. In contrast, the privileged upper echelon who could afford health care at
the private hospital were granted quite a different type of treatment.
At the private Metropilitan hospital all the amenities of an
American hospital were available. For example, the X-ray machines all functioned properly, the
autoclaves worked consistently, and the surgery theaters all were
completed within the last few years.
However, while these disparities illustrated an obvious distinction
between the two hospitals their ramifications spilled over into the
conditions of the hospital. Marching through the narrow, dingy halls of Eugenio Espejo Hospital we
immediately noticed overworked staff working in disorganized and
inadequately supplied departments. The
severely underpaid staff was required to work long hours and constantly
find innovative and resourceful ways to provide care in a starving
hospital. In stark contrast
to the public hospital, the Metropolitan hospital had an attractive lobby
with attentive desk clerics, clean and tidy halls, ventilated and odorless
air, private patient rooms, well-organized, equipped departments, and
un-rushed nurses and doctors. It
seemed that whether bestowed with hardships and low pay, or contentment
and high pay, staff at either hospital showed steadfast dedication and
commitment to providing the best care possible for their people.
There were also differences noted between the doctors who were
employed at each of the hospitals. These
differences perpetuated the theme of inequality between the poor masses
and the wealthy few. Physicians in America hold a position of prestige and trust, but this is
not the case in Ecuador. Imagine
a place where doctors are forced to leave their profession to be taxi
drives just to allow them to support their own families; a place where
medical students are required to spend three months in a hospital just to
provide enough staffing. This,
in turn, makes the public hospital more of teaching facility with less
experienced hands in charge and are there only to serve the poor.
Doctors in public hospitals here make an average of four thousand
dollars a year - taxi drivers, about sixteen thousand.
This is a striking contrast to the physicians found in the private
hospitals, which are very comparable to those hospitals in the United
States. For information about upcoming programs visit
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||